VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2022 › High Court of Delhi

Welspun One Logistics Parks Fund I v. Mr Mohit Verma & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
19 December 2022
Bench
Navin Chawlaauthor
Case no.
ARB.P. 792/2022

Judgment

NAVIN CHAWLA, J. DECEMBER 19, 2022/Ais/s

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12.12.2022 Date of decision:19.12.2022 + ARB.P. 792/2022 & I.A. 17174/2022 WELSPUN ONE LOGISTICS PARKS FUND I ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Jayant Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Sanya Sud, Mr.Sanjeev Sharma, Ms.Divya Joshi, Mr.Siddharth & Ms.Ananya Pratap Singh, Advs. versus MR. MOHIT VERMA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sumit Kochhar, Ms.Laavanya Kaushik, Mr.Vineet Malhotra, Ms.Skhita, Mr.Mohit Paul, Mr.Vishal Gohri, Mr.Rajdeep Panda, Mr.Chitranshul Sinha, Ms.Sanjam Chawla & Ms.Akshita Upadhyay, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act') seeking appointment of an Arbitrator for adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the "Non-Binding Term Sheet" dated 26.11.2021 (hereinafter referred to as the "Term Sheet") executed between the parties. 2. The Arbitration Agreement between the parties is contained in Clause 12 of the Term Sheet, and is reproduced hereinbelow:- "12) Governing Law and Jurisdiction This Term Sheet and any other documentation with respect to any transaction contemplated herein shall be governed by Indian law. All disputes arising out of and/ or due to this Term Sheet shall be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 through a sole arbitrator to be mutually appointed by the parties with seat and venue in Delhi." 3. Though the agreement is titled as "Non-Binding Term Sheet", it further provides as under:- "Notwithstanding the usage of "Non-Binding" as a suffix to the Term Sheet at certain places above, it is agreed that the Term Sheet shall be binding upon the parties to the following extent and clause only during the Term,; (i) During the Term, the Sellers and the Buyer shall abide by the terms of this Term Sheet. Also, the Seller shall maintain exclusivity for Lands-A, Govt Lands/ Lease Lands for the Buyer and shall not support or cause the transfer of Lands-B to any third party. (ii) Further, during the Term, both Parties shall act in good earnest and work towards closure of the transaction, including discussions and finalizations of the transaction documents. (iii) The Clauses pertaining to Confidentiality, Expenses and Dispute Resolution, shall be binding upon the Parties." (Emphasis supplied) 4. Disputes having arisen between the parties, the petitioner invoked the Arbitration Agreement vide notice dated 06.06.2022. The same was replied to by the respondents, through their counsel, vide notice dated 05.07.2022, refusing the appointment of an Arbitrator. 5. The learned senior counsel for the respondents submits that the present petition is not maintainable inasmuch as the agreement being relied upon itself states that it is a "Non-Binding Term Sheet". He submits that even though the agreement further states that the Dispute Resolution Clause in the said agreement would bind the parties, the same can be of no consequence inasmuch as the other terms of the agreement remain non-binding. He submits that a dispute cannot, therefore, be referred in a vacuum. 6. The learned senior counsel for the respondents further submits that the said Term Sheet is for the transfer of land in favour of the petitioner. Placing reliance on the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the "Regulations'), he submits that in terms of Clause 17 of the Regulations, a Category II Alternative Investment Fund is permitted to invest only in un-listed investee companies or in the units of Category I or other Category II Alternative Investment Funds as may be disclosed in the placement memorandum; the fund cannot invest directly in the purchase of land. He submits that, therefore, the consideration under the subject Term Sheet is itself illegal and the

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.