- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 3 January 2017
- Bench
- T.S. Thakur, A. M. Khanwilkar, D. Y. Chandrachud
- Case no.
- Civil Appeal No. 4235 of2014
Headnote
BCCJ matter:
Appointment as members of the committee of administrators - Nomination of names for, in terms of the order dated January 02, 2017 passed by this Court - In place of Mr. Fali S. Nariman, senior counsel, Mr. Anil B. Divan, senior counsel, Jo assist the Court and recommend suitable names for appointment as members of the committee of administrators in consultation with the amicus, Mr. Gopal Subramaniam - Further modification/correction of clause 25(i)(f) of the said order - Clause 25(i)(f) to be read as 'has been an Office Bearer of the BCCI or a State Association for a cumulative period of 9 years'.
Headnote as published in the Digital Supreme Court Reports by the Supreme Court of India. Paragraph references point to the judgment below.
Judgment
ORDER
By our order pronounced on 2"' January, 20.17 we had requested learned amicus curiae, Mr. Gopal Subramaniam, and Mr. Fali S. Nariman, learned senior counsel to assist us in nominating the members of the committee of administrators to be appointed in terms of the said order. Although Mr. Nariman had tentatively agreed to do the needful, he today. submits that he may have an embarrassment in accepting the assignment on account of the fact that he had been in the year 2009 retained on behalf of th.e BCCI. We quite appreciate the difficulty expressed by Mr. Nariman and accordingly discharge him of the role assigned to him. In 11is place, we request Mr. Anil B. Divan, learned senior counsel, to assist the Court and to recommend suitable names for appointment as members of the committee of administrators in consultation with the amicus, Mr.'Gopal Subramaniam.
Mr. Gopal Subramaniarn also draws our attention to an inadvertent error in our Order, clause 25(i)(f) whereof shall now stand modified/ corrected to read as under:
"25(i)(f) Has been an Office Bearer of the BCCI or a State Association for a cumulative period of9 years" Nidhi Jain ~1odification in earlier order.
Case details
Arising from
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION '. Civil Appeai No. 4235 of2014.
From the Judgment and Order dated 30.07.2013 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in PIL No, 55 of 2013.
WITH
Appearances
Civil Appeal Nos. 4236 of2014 and 1155 of2015 Maninder Singh, ASG, Gopal Subramanium, (AC), Kap ii Sibal, Arbind Dattar, Pramod Swarup, Sr. Advs., Santosh Krislman, Ankut Kashyap, Raghav Chadha, Pavan Bhushan, Ms. Radlia Rangaswamy, Ms. Raajeet.a Rohatgi, Abhilll\v Mukerji, Ameet Singh, Ms. Pareeria Swarup, Praveen Swarup, Ms. Sushma Venna, Sahil, V.K. Biju, Ms. Ria Sachthey, Amit A. Pai, Senthil Jagadeesan, Nirnimesh Dube, Yikas Mehta, M. Yogesh Kanna, Ms. Nithya, Ravindra Bana, R. Balasubramanian, Prabhas Bajaj, Akshay Amritanshu, Ms. Aarti Shanna, Ananya Mishra, Raj Bahadur, 1\1. K. Maroria, Amal Chitale, Ms. Pragya Baghel, Ms. Samten Dama, Nirnimesh Dube, Gagan Gupta, Ms. Rashmi Singh, Ms. Manju Sharma, Venkita Subramoniam T. R., Gaurav Sharma, AS. Bhasme, Ms. Sonia Mathur, Mrs. Lalita Kaushik, Shree Pal Singh, E.C. Agrawala, Raghavendra S. Srivastava, Anish R. Shah, Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Chi rag M. Shroff, Shreekant N. Terdal, Praveen Swarup, Ms. Liz Mathew, Anshuman Ashok, Ms. Kamakshi S. Mehlwal, Advs. for the appearing parties.
Source: Supreme Court of India, Digital Supreme Court Reports, via the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.