- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 9 November 2016
- Bench
- T.S. Thakur, A. M. Khanwilkar
- Case no.
- Civil Appeal No. 4715of2011
Headnote
Judgment/Order - Modification/correction - To be treated as part of the judgment reported in [2016] 5 SCR 278-Word "Neelam Nag" in the cause title to be read as "Neelam Nag & Am: - Word "respondent" in the judgment to be read as "respondent No. l ".
Headnote as published in the Digital Supreme Court Reports by the Supreme Court of India. Paragraph references point to the judgment below.
Judgment
ORDER
The following modification/correction shall be treated as part of the judgment dated 16.09.2016 in the aforementioned appeal:-
(i) The word "Neelam Nag" in the cause title shall be read as
" Neelam Nag & Anr."
(ii) The word "respondent" whereever referred in the judgment
shall be read as "respondent No. I".
Nidhi Jain Modification in earlier judgment
Case details
Arising from
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 4715 of201 l.
From the Judgment and Order dated 28.06.2010 of the High Court of Judicature at Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh in WA 80 of2010.
Appearances
K. V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Adv, Sanjay Kapur, Anmol Chandan, Ms. Priyanka Das, Ms. Shubhra Kapur, Advs. for the Appellants.
Atul Jha, Sandeep Jha, Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, R. B. Sharma, Akshat Shrivastava, Ms. Manjeet Kirpal, Advs. for the Respondents.
Source: Supreme Court of India, Digital Supreme Court Reports, via the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.