- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 22 September 2014
- Bench
- Pinaki Chandra Ghose
- Case no.
- Criminal Appeal Nos. 1555 of 2008
- Result
- Appeal dismissed.
Headnote
Penal Code, 1860-ss.3021149-Dispute over land-Murder-Conviction and life imprisonment-Held: In view of dismissal of SLP separately filed by one of the -accused namely 'N', as reported in [2014] 14 SCR 1354, the instant appeal also dismissed.
Headnote as published in the Digital Supreme Court Reports by the Supreme Court of India. Paragraph references point to the judgment below.
Judgment
M. Y. EQBAL, J.1. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and also learned counsel for the respondent State. We have already discussed all the facts and circumstances of the case in Criminal Appeal Nos:1551-1554 of 2008 filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the same have been dismissed by a separate judgment pronounced today.
¶2So far as the present appeal by Tej Pal is concerned, separate special leave petition preferred by one of the accused namely Narendra has already been dismissed by this Court.
A We also do not find any merit in this appeal filed by accused
Tej Pal which is also dismissed.
Case details
Arising from
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 1555 of 2008.
From the Judgment and Order dated 27.05.2005.passed by the High Court of Judicature for Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No. 2181 of 2004.
Sandhya Goswami, Saryaya Krishna, Mahender P.S.
Appearances
Tamar and Jabar Singh, Advs., for the Appellant.
. Ratnakar Dash, Sr. Adv., Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Abhisth Kumar and Som Raj Choudhury,Advs., forthe Respondent.
Source: Supreme Court of India, Digital Supreme Court Reports, via the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.