VoxJuris
Home › 2011 › Supreme Court of India

Afjal Imam v. State of Bihar & Ors.

Appeal(s) allowed
Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
1 April 2011
Bench
J. M. Panchal, H. L. Gokhale
Case no.
Civil Appeal No. 2843 of 2011
Result
Appeal allowed.·

Headnote

Bihar Municipal Act, 2007 - ss. 27, 25 (4), 23(3), 21(3) and 21 (4) - Election of appellant as Mayor of Municipal Corporation - Appellant nominated seven Municipal Councillors to the Empowered Standing Committee - Entitlement of the appellant as well as the members of the Empowered Standing Committee to exercise all the powers as the Mayor and the members of the Empowered Standing Committee as provided in the Act - Held: Entitled - Judgment containing the reasons to follow separately - s. 27 is to be read down harmoniously with ss. 25(4), 23(3), 21 (3) and 21 (4) - Direction issued to respondent no. 3-District Magistrate Patna, Bihar to administer the oath of secrecy u/s. 24 to the seven Municipal Councillors.

Headnote as published in the Digital Supreme Court Reports by the Supreme Court of India. Paragraph references point to the judgment below.

Judgment

¶1Leave Granted.

¶2Appeal allowed. Impugned judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the Patna High Court in Writ Petition bearing No.CWJC 9981/2010 dated 8th July, 2010 is set asic;!~ The said writ petition filed by the appellant herein stands allowed in part. Section 27 of the Bihar Municipal Act 2007 shall be read down harmoniously with Sections 25 (4), 23 (3), 21 (3) and 21 (4) of the said Act. The respondent no.3, the District Magistrate Patna, Bihar is directed to administer the oath of secrecy under Section 24 of the Act to the seven Municipal Councillors nominated by the appellant to the Empowered Standing Committee. The appellant as well as the members of the Empowered Standing Committee shall be entitled to exercise all the powers as the Mayor and the members of the Empowered Standing Committee as provided in t~e Bihar Municipal Act, 2007, in accordance with law.

-.

¶3Judgment containing the reasons to follow separately.

Case details

Arising from

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 2843 of 2011.

From the Judgment & Order dated 8.7.2010 of the High Court of Judicature of Patna in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9981 of 2010.

Appearances

S.B.K. Mangalam, Rajesh Anand, Ashutosh Pande, Madhumita Singh, Abhay Kumar for the Appellant.

Santosh Mishra, Gopal Singh, Manish Kumar, Chandan Kumar, Santosh Kumar TrijJathi, Neeraj Shekhar for the Respondents.

Source: Supreme Court of India, Digital Supreme Court Reports, via the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.