- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 22 October 2008
- Bench
- Arijit Pasayat, C. K. Thakker, Lokeshwar Singh Panta
Headnote
t Practice and procedure - Revision - Disposal of, on the
day of admission by cryptic and non-reasoned order - Propriety of - Held: Not proper-Since the court felt that there was some arguable points, the revision petition was admitted - If there was no substance, it should not have been admitted - Thus, order of High Court set aside and matter remitted back to it for fresh disposal - Judgment/Order - Revision - Food Adulteration Act, 1948.
Headnote as published in the Digital Supreme Court Reports by the Supreme Court of India. Paragraph references point to the judgment below.
Judgment
DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. 1. Heard.
¶2Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court in Criminal
Case details
Arising from
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 55 of 2002.
From the final Judgment and Order dated 17.4.2001 of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Criminal Revision No. 206 of 2001.
Appearances
Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv., Prasanth P. and T. Harish Kumar for the Appellant.
r-
Ashok Bhan, Ahsa G. Nair, Anil Katiyar and D.S. Mahra for the Respondent.
Source: Supreme Court of India, Digital Supreme Court Reports, via the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.