VoxJuris
Home › 2005 › Supreme Court of India

Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Aurangabad v. M/S. Ceat Ltd., Nasik

Dismissed
Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
17 February 2005
Bench
S. N. Variava, Ar. Lakshmanan, S. H. Kapadiaauthor
Result
Appeal dismissed.

Headnote

Central Excise Act, 1944; Section 35L/Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Tariff Headings 59.02 and 59.06, Chapter Note-4 to Chapter 59 and Note-4 to Section XI of the Act: Classification-Dipped Tyre Fabric/Rubberised Tyre Cord Fabric-levy of excise duty under Tariff Headings 59.02 or 59.06-Held: Jn view of reasons recorded in the connected case viz. Commissioner of Central Excise v. MR.F. Ltd, the appeal is dismissed

Headnote as published in the Digital Supreme Court Reports by the Supreme Court of India. Paragraph references point to the judgment below.

Judgment

KAPADIA, J. For the reasons given in our decision in Commissioner of Central Excise v. M.R.F. ltd., reported in (2005) I Scale 554, this Civil Appeal filed by the department relating to classification of Rubberised Tyre Cord Fabric is dismissed,. with no order as to costs.

Case details

Arising from

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 6971of1999. From the Judgment and Order dated 5.4.99 of the Central Excise, Customs and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, West Reginal Bench at Mumbai in A. No. E/167-R/99-Bom in F.O. No. C-11504-505/WZB of 1999.

R. Mohan, Additional Solicitor General, Rajiv Dutta, Hemant Shanna, P. Panneswaran and B.Krishna Prasad for the Appeltant.

Appearances

Ravinder Narain, Sonu Bhatnagar, Ajay Aggarwal and Rajan Narain for the Respondent.

Source: Supreme Court of India, Digital Supreme Court Reports, via the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.