- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 20 November 1996
- Bench
- K. Ramaswamy, G. T. Nanavati, K. Venkataswami
- Result
- Appeal allowed.
Headnote
Insurance :
Insurance policy-Insurance of motor vehicle-Renewal premium-Not paid within renewal date-Effect of-Renewal premium due to be paid on 14. /0.1983-Premium paid at 4 P.M. on 25. I 0.1983-Insurance policy remained under suspension from 14.10.1983 to 25./0.1983 till 4 P.M-Contract of renewal came into force at 4. 00 P.M on 25.10.1983-Accident took place at 11.14 A.M on 25. /0.1983-Liability of insurance company-Held, in view of special contract mentioned in insurance policy, namely it would be operative from 4. 00 P.M on 25. I 0.1983, the insurance coverage would not enable the claimant to seek recovery of the amount from the insurance company-Claimant is at liberty to make any claim against owner of the vehicle.
New India Assurance Co. v.Ram Dayal, 1199012 SCR 570, referred to.
Headnote as published in the Digital Supreme Court Reports by the Supreme Court of India. Paragraph references point to the judgment below.
Judgment
This appeal by special leave is cofined to the question as to whether the accident had occurred during the operation of the insurance policy in controversy. The admitted position is that the renewal of the insurance was effected as under :
"Address: Jal Apartment, ....... Pd. Vile Parle (N) Bombay. 5. It is hereby understood and agreed that the renewal premium of Rs. 1307 only under this Policy having been paid on 25.10.1983 and not within the renewal date viz.14.10.1983 the Insurance by this Policy is suspended from 14.10.1983 (4." p.m.) to 24.10.1983.
Further, it is declared and agreed that the cover under this Policy is reinstated and renewed for a further period of twelve months from 25.10.1983 to 24.10.1984 at a premium of Rs. 1307."
The Tribunal also had recorded, as a fact, that on October 25, 1983 at 4.00 p.m. the contract of renewal had come into force and it would be operative upto October 24, 1984. The Tribunal also recorded, as a fact, that the accident had occured on October 25, ! 983 at 11.14 a.m. that is, before the renewal <if the contract. Under these circumstances, it would clear that the accident had occurred when the renewal had not taken effect.
This Court in New India Assurance Co v. Ram Dayal, [1990] 2 SCR 570, had held that in the absence of any specific time mentioned in that behalf, the contract would be operative from the mid-night of the day by operation of provisions of the General Clauses Act. But in view of the special contract mentioned in the insurance policy, namely, it would be operative from 4.00 p.m. on October 25, 1983 and the accident had occurred earlier thereto, the insurance coverage would not enable, and claimant to seek recovery of the amount from the appellant-Company.
The appeal is accordingly allowed only to the above extent. In respect of any claim against the owner, the respondent is at liberty to have it recovered. No costs.
Case details
Arising from
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 2671 of 1991.
From the Judgment and Order dated 20.12.89 of the Gujarat High Court in F.A. No. 1366 of 1989.
Jitander Sharma, Mrs. Gunwat Dara, Ms. Minakshi Vij. P. Gaur for the Appellant.
Appearances
H.A. Raichura for the Respondent in C.A. No. 2671/91.
Source: Supreme Court of India, Digital Supreme Court Reports, via the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.