VoxJuris
Home › 1995 › Supreme Court of India

State of Manipur v. Shri Nambam Dwijen Singh and Ors.

Disposed of
Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
2 November 1995
Bench
K. Ramaswamy, B. L. Hansaria
Result
Appeal disposed.

Headnote

.Se1vice laiv :

Manipur State Engi.neeiing Seivice--Policy decision to constitute two branches viz., Executive Branch for Generation and Executive Civil Division-Demarcation of posts and appointment thereto-Constituting D.P.C. and ntaking appointnzent according to 1ules--Directions issued.

In this appeal againsi the High Court's Judgment, this Court directed the State Government to consider and determine the restructure of the electrical and civil engineering departments and the required num-ber of posts in each department and. the qualifications prescribed and principles for filling up those posts, and granted two months time as sought for.

Disposing of the appeal, this Court HELD : Pursuant to this Court's directions given on November 25, 1994, the Government has taken a policy decision reorganising the Depart-ment into two branches, viz., Executive Branch for Generation with 17 demarcated posts and Electrical Civil Division with four demarcated posts. In view of this policy decision, since the respondents fall in the category of Executive Civil Division, a D.P.C. would be constituted to consider the relative merits of the candidates to be selected as Executive Engineer and thereafter appointment would be made according to Rules. (733-BJ

Headnote as published in the Digital Supreme Court Reports by the Supreme Court of India. Paragraph references point to the judgment below.

Judgment

Leave granted.

This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and order dated March 22, 1994 passed in W.A. No. 27 of 1993 by the Gauhati High Court at Imphal. The High Court directed the appellant in the ultimate order thus :

"Undisputedly after the judgment was passed in C.R. No. 132 of 1993 the vacant posts of Executive Engineer of the Civil Circle of the Electricity Department are filled up by putting the respondents incharge. It is not the case that the vacant posts are never filled up that being so the submission of Mr. Nandkumar that the Court cannot direct to fill up all vacant posts by the Govt. is without submissions. The subsequent policy decision if any to reorganise the Electricity Department is irrelevant as far as the valid;ty of the judgment and order dated 11.10.1993 passed iu Civil Rules No. 933 of 1993 is concerned. In the appeal our scrutiny is confined to the statements made in the C.R. No. 933 of 1993 and counter if any and not extraneous subsequent facts. We have persued the impugned _judgment and order and we do not find any infirmity and that being so the appeal is without merit and is dismissed." When the matter came up before us, we directed on November 25, 1994 thus:

''ln the facts and circumstances, before deciding the actual con-troversy, it is necessary that the State Government should take a policy decision as to how many of the posts in each of electrical and civil engineering are required to be created and then the principles on the basis of which they are required to fill the posts. Until that is done, it is difficult to give any direction to consider 'the claims of the respective candidates in the respective branches. The State Government, therefore, is directed to consider and determine the restructure of the electrical and civil engineering departments and the required number of posts in each department and the qualifications prescribed and principles for filling up all

those posts. Two months time is sought for and granted."

Pursuant thereto, now, the Government has taken a policy decision reorganising the Department into two branches, viz., Executive Branch for Generation with 17 demarcated posts and Electrical Civil Division with four demarcated posts. In view of the policy decision, since the respondents fall in the category of Executive Civil Division, a D.P.C. would be con-stituted to consider the relative merits of the candidates to be selected as Executive Engineer and thereafter appointment would be made according to rules.

The appeal is disposed of acconlingly. No costs.

Case details

Arising from

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 10245 of 1995.

From the Judgment and Order dated 22.3.94 of the Gauhati High Court in W.P. No. 27/93.

Appearances

S. Janani, Advocate for the Appellant.

S.K. Bhattacharya and L.K. Paonam for the Respondents.

Source: Supreme Court of India, Digital Supreme Court Reports, via the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.