- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 31 July 1995
- Bench
- K. Ramaswamy, K. S. Paripoornan
- Result
- Appeal disposed of.
Headnote
U.P. Labour SelVice Rules, 1991: Rule 5 Assistant Labour Commissioners-Promotion-Directions regarding. The Public Service Commission selected candidates for the post of Assistant Labour Commissioners and forwarded the select list to the Government for approval subject to the result of a writ petition filed by a candidate who has since retired.
Disposing the appeal with regard to the claim of the other officers, this Court
HELD : The claims of others for promotion require to be considered and finalised. The Government is directed to finalise the list as recom-mended by the Public Service Commission and then make promotion to the substantive posts according to Rules of all the persons recommended by the Public Service Commission within the quota prescribed under Rule 5 of the U.P. Labour Service Rules, 1991. [425-C-D]
Headnote as published in the Digital Supreme Court Reports by the Supreme Court of India. Paragraph references point to the judgment below.
Judgment
Leave granted.
We have heard the counsel for the parties. The admitted facts as transpired from the record are that the Assistant Labour Commissioners are eligible to be promoted according to Rule 5 of the U.P. Labour Service Rules , 1991 to their quota of 50%. The balance 50% shall be filled in by direct recruitment. Twenty-three posts are available for promotion. The Selection Committee consisting of members of the Public Service Commis-sion and the Departmental personnel considered the inter se claims from feeder posts on September 13, 1993 and forwarded to the Government the select list for approval subject to the result in W.P. No. 5744/86. One Mr. Awasthi who filed that writ petiton has since been retired as Dy Labour Officer pursuant to the direction issued by the Court, the claims of others for promotion require to be considered and finalised. We direct the Government to finalise the list as recommended by the Public Service Commission and then. make promotion to the substantive posts according to Rules of all the persons recommended by the Public Service Commission within the quota prescribed under the Rules. The appeal is disposed of. No costs.
Case details
Arising from
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 7400 of 1995.
From the Judgment and Order dated 19.5.94 of the Allahabad High J Court in C.M.W.P. No. Nil of 1994.
Appearances
Gaurab Banerjee and Devendra Singh for the Appellants.
·G Goodwill Indeevar for the Respondent
Ms. Rachna Gupta and AK. Srivastava for the Respondent No. 3-4.
Source: Supreme Court of India, Digital Supreme Court Reports, via the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.