VoxJuris
Home › 1994 › Supreme Court of India

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation v. B.K. Doreswamy and Ors.

Appeal(s) allowed
Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
21 July 1994
Bench
Kuldip Singhauthor, M. M. Punchhi, K. Ramaswamy
Result
Appeal allowed.

Headnote

SERVICE LAW-Selection-Kamataka Govemment lllstructions dated September 6, 1969-l'ara 6-Selectioll for posts of Assistallt Stores/Pur-chase Officers ill State Road Trallsport Corporation-Reservation for Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes & other backward classes-Absence of a candidate belollging to a reserved class-Such vacancy to be filled by selection Oil basis of general merit.

The reservation for Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes and other backward classes was regulated in the State of Karnataka by the Govern-ment Instructions dated September 6, 1969. Para 6 of the said Instructions provides classification and rotation of vacancies for open competi-tion/backward classes/Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The Kar-nataka State Road Transport Corporation held selections for the posts of Assistant Stores/Purc;.ase Officers in the year 1972. Four selected can-didates were appointed. Since no Scheduled Tribe candidate was selected the first vacancy which was meant for the Scheduled Tribes was given to a general category candidate, who was even otherwise on the top of the merit list. The next candidat.e was the Scheduled Caste candidate.

The selected Scheduled Caste candidate filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Transport Corporation to treat him senior to the general category candidate in the cadre of Assistant Stores/Purchase Officers on the ground that since the Scheduled Tribe candidate was not available he being a member of the Scheduled Caste was entitled to the first vacancy. The writ petition was allowed by the High Court. Writ appeal filed by the Corporation was dismissed. This appeal was filed against the judgment of the High Court.

Allowing the appeal, this court HELD : 1. In the State of Karnataka, according to the Government Instructions dated September 6, 1969, out of the merit list the first vacancy was to be filled by appointing a Scheduled Tribe candidate. Since the Scheduled Tribe candidate was not available the vacancy was to be tilled in accordance \\ith the provisions of para 6 of the Instructions. Under the said paragraph, when a person belonging to Scheduled Tribe is not avail-able for being selected against the vacancy reserved for the said class, such vacancy has to be tilled by selection on the basis of general merit. Since in the present case the Scheduled Tribe candidate was not available, the first vacancy was rightly tilled by appointing a general candidate who was at number one in the merit list. It is nowhere provided in the instructions of the Government of Karnataka that when a person belonging to a reserved class is not available then the vacany is to be filled by a candidate of another reserve class. (22-A to Cl

Headnote as published in the Digital Supreme Court Reports by the Supreme Court of India. Paragraph references point to the judgment below.

Judgment

KULDIP SINGH, J. The Karnataka State Road Transport Corpora-tion (the Corporation) held selections for the posts of Assistant Stores/Pur-chase Officers in the year 1972. The first four candidates selected in order of merit were as under :~

¶1Shri A.M. Khan 2. Shri S.S. Shiro!

31.Shri K.G. Doddamani 4. Shri B.K. Doreswamy The reservation for Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes and other backward classes was regulated in the State of Karnataka by the Govern-ment Instructions dated September 6, 1969. Annexure-1 to the said Instruc-tions provides classification and rotation of vacancies for open competition/backward classes/Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the following manner :

¶1Scheduled Tribes 2. Scheduled Castes 3. Backward Classes 4. Open competition Para 6 of the Instructions is as under :

"When a person belonging to Scheduled Tribes, the Scheduled Castes or other backward classes is not available for being selected for a vacancy reserved for such class, such vacancy shall be filled by selection on the basis· of general merit."

The above mentioned four selected candidates were appointed as Assistant Stores/Purchase Officers by the order dated November 19, 1972. The appointments were in the following order :

A.M. Khan (General Category) B.M. Doreswamy (Scheduled Caste) S.S. Shirai K.G. Doddamani Since no Scheduled Tribe candidate was selected the first vacancy which was meant for the Scheduled Tribes was given to A.M. Khan, general category candidate, who was even otherwise on the top of the merit list.

B.K. Doreswamy filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court seeking a mandamus directing the corporation to treat him senior to A.M. Khan in the cadre of Assistant Stores/Purchase Officers on the ground that since the Scheduled Tribe candidate was not available he being a member of the Scheduled Caste was entitled to the first vacancy. The writ petition was allowed by a learned single Judge of the High Court. Writ appeal filed by the Corporation was dismissed by the .Division Bench of the High Court. This appeal by the Corporation is against the judgments of the High Court.

We are of the view that the High Court fell into patent error in interpreting the Government instructions dated September 6, 1969. It is no doubt corrrect that out of the merit list the first vacancy was to be filled by appointing a Scheduled Tribe candidate. Since the Scheduled Tribe candidate was not available the vacancy was to be filled in accordance with the provisions of para 6 of the Government Instructions. Under the said paragrph, quoted above, when a person belonging to Scheduled Tribe is not available for being selected against the vacancy reserved for the said class, such vacancy has to be filled by selection on the basis of general merit. Since in the present case the Scheduled Tribe candidate was not available, the first vacancy was rightly filled by appointing A.M. Khan who was at number one of the merit list. It is nowhere provided in the insiruc-tions of the Government of Karnataka that when a person belonging to a reserve class is not available then the vacancy is to be filled by a candidate of another reserve class. On the other hand the instructions specifically provide that in the absence of the candidate belonging to a reserved class the vacancy has to be filled by selection on the basis of general merit. The order of appointment dated November 19, 1972 issu.ed by the State Government was in conformity with the Government Instructions and no fault could .be found with the same. A.M. Khan having been rightly ap-pointed at number one in accordance with the Government Instructions he would rank senior to B.K. Doreswamy in the cadre .of Assistant Stores/Pur-chase Officers.

For the reasons recorded above, we allow the appeal, set aside the order of the learned single Judge dated November 26, 1982 and of the Division Bench dated June 17, 1986 and dismiss the writ petition filed by B.K. Doreswamy before the High Court. No. costs.

Case details

Arising from

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 118 of 1987 .

. '

From the Judgment and Order dated 17.6.86 of the Karnataka High Court in WA. No. 1922/83.

Appearances

K.R. Nagaraja for the Appellant.

Source: Supreme Court of India, Digital Supreme Court Reports, via the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.