Registration Act, 1908
15 Supreme Court judgments considering this law. Search within these.
-
Adarsh Sahkari Grih Nirman Swawlambi Society Ltd. v. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Issue arose whether the impugned Memo issued by the Principal Secretary, Department of Registration liable to be set aside on the ground of illegality, as it seeks to rely on a superfluous and redundant requirement.
-
Samiullah v. The State of Bihar & Ors.
Issue arose as regard the sub-rules (xvii) and (xviii) to r.19 of the Bihar Registration Rules, 2008 empowering registering authorities to refuse registration of documents, if proof of mutation of the property under sale in…
-
Mahnoor Fatima Imran & Ors. v. M/S Visweswara Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. & Ors.
1. Whether an unregistered sale agreement can confer valid title or ownership of immovable property. 2. Whether a High Court exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 can direct dispossession of a party without proof of actual…
-
Arunkumar H Shah Huf v. Avon Arcade Premises Co-Operative Society Limited & Ors.
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the judgment passed by the High Court affirming the order of the competent authority issuing certificate of deemed conveyance in respect of a plot to first respondent.
-
The Correspondence, Rbanms Educational Institution v. B. Gunashekar & Another
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court and the trial court rejecting the application filed by the appellant u/Ord.VII r.11(a) and (d) CPC for the rejection of plaint.
-
K. Gopi v. The Sub-Registrar & Ors.
Matter pertains to the correctness of order by the Division Bench of the High Court with regard to upholding the order of the sub-registrar, refusing registration of a sale deed.
-
M.S. Ananthamurthy & Anr. v. J. Manjula
Whether an agent by virtue of being a holder of the General Power of Attorney (‘GPA’) along with Agreement to Sell had any right, title or interest in the subject-matter of the agency, to execute a registered sale deed after the…
-
Mukesh v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr.
Whether the High Court was right in holding that the compromise decree in favor of the appellant needed registration and stamp duty was also required to be paid for mutation of the subject land.
-
Daliben Valjibhai & Ors. v. Prajapati Kodarbhai Kachrabhai & Anr.
Whether a suit for cancellation of a registered sale deed, filed within three years from the date of knowledge as alleged in the plaint, can be dismissed at the threshold under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure,…
-
The State of Punjab & Anr. v. M/s Ferrous Alloy Forgings P Ltd. & Ors.
Whether it is mandatory for the successful auction purchaser to deposit the stamp duty for the sale certificate to be issued to it in view of the provisions of the Stamp Act and the Registration Act.
-
Shyamsundar Radheshyam Agrawal & Anr. v. Pushpabai Nilkanth Patil & Ors.
Whether the appellants are liable to pay stamp duty and penalty on the agreements to sell executed prior to the sale deed executed in their favour.
-
Industries Ltd. v. Union of India [2000] Supp. 4 SCR 44 : (2001) 1
The questions which arose for determination are as to what is the true nature of royalty determined u/s.9 r/w s.15(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957; whether royalty is in the nature of tax; what…
-
Kaushik Premkumar Mishra & Anr. v. Kanji Ravaria @ Kanji & Anr.
Whether the sale deed dated 02.12.1985 was executed by Respondent No. 2; whether the sale consideration was paid with respect to sale deed dated 02.12.1985; whether the sale deed dated 02.12.1985 was presented for registration on…
-
Maharaj Singh & Ors. v. Karan Singh (Dead) Thr. Lrs. & Ors.
Can the contention that the suit agreement was sham and bogus and not intended to be acted upon be allowed to be raised notwithstanding Sections 91 and 92 of the Evidence Act; Was the suit agreement sham and bogus and not…
-
Jugal Kishore Khanna (D) Thr. Lrs. & Anr. v. Sudhir Khanna & Ors.
Whether the High Court erred in finding without any evidence that the amount alleged to have been paid as the value of share in Joint Hindu Family property is not so but for some other purpose.