Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 · Chapter IV: Suits in Particular Cases Suits by or against the Government or Public Officers in Their Official Capacity · Suits against rulers of former indian states
Section 87B: Application of sections 85 and 86 to Rulers of former Indian States
In plain words
In suits by or against the Ruler of a notified former Indian State based on causes of action arising before the commencement of the Constitution (the 26th day of January, 1950), section 85 and sub-sections (1) and (3) of section 86 apply as they do to foreign Rulers.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
[(I) In the case of any suit by or against the Ruler of any former Indian State which is based wholly or in part upon a cause of action which arose before the commencement of the Constitution or any proceeding arising out of such suit, the provisions of section 85 and sub-sections (1) and (3) of section 86 shall apply in relation to such Ruler as they apply in relation to the Ruler of a foreign State.]
(2) In this section
(a) "former Indian State" means any such Indian State as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify for the purposes of this section; 2 ***
[(b) "Commencement of the Constitution" means the 26th day of January, 1950; and
(c) "Ruler", in relation to a former Indian State, has the same meaning as in article 363 of the Constitution.]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 87B
-
Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited & Anr v. Union of India & Ors.
Whether, the Explanation(s) appended to Rule 38 of the Mineral (Other than Atomic and Hydrocarbons Energy Minerals) Concession Rules, 2016 and Rule 45 of the Mineral Conservation and Development Rules, 2017 respectively…
-
IN RE : SECTION 6A OF THE CITIZENSHIP ACT 1955 versus
Issue arose as regards the constitutional validity of s.6A of the Citizenship Act; does s.6A offend preambular values like fraternity; s.6A, if ultra vires Part II of the Constitution; does s.6A create an unreasonable…
-
Fuleshwar Gope v. Union of India & Ors.
Issue arose as to whether the validity of the Sanction Order can be challenged at any stage; whether violation of s.45(2) of the UAPA r/w rr.3 and 4 of the 2008 Rules, if any, vitiates the proceedings, whether violation…
- Sri Marthanda Varma (D) Thr. Lrs. & Anr. v. State of Kerala & Ors.
- Rangku Dutta @ Ranjan Kumar Dutta v. State of Assam
- Satyawati Sharma (Dead) by Lrs. v. Union of India and Anr.
- Malpe V!Shwanath Acharya and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
- His Highness Maharaja Pratap Singh v. Her Highness Maharani Sarojini Devi and Ors.
- Raghunathrao Ganpatrao Etc. Etc. v. Union of India
- Motor General Traders & Anr. Etc Etc. v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. Etc. Etc.
- H. H. Shri Swamiji of Shri Admar Muti, Etc. v. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department & Ors
- H. H. Maharajadhiraja Madhav Rao Jiwaji Rao Scindia Bahadur & Ors. v. Union of India
- S.K. Dutta, Income-Tax Officer & Ors. v. Lawrence Singh Ingty
- Her Highness Maharani Mandalsa Devi and Ors. v. M. Ramnarain (P) Ltd. and Ors.
- Nawab Usmanali Khan v. Sagarmal
- Narotiam Kishore Dev Varma and Ors. v. Union of India and Another
- H.H. the Maharana Sahib Shri Bhagwat Singh Bahadur of Udaipur v. The State of Rajasthan and Others
- Mohanlal Jain v. His Highness Maharajshri Sawai Man Singhji